首页> 外文OA文献 >A Comparison of Boosted-Discharge Hollow Cathode Lamps and an Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) as Excitation Sources in ICP Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry
【2h】

A Comparison of Boosted-Discharge Hollow Cathode Lamps and an Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) as Excitation Sources in ICP Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometry

机译:增强放电空心阴极灯和电感耦合等离子体(ICp)作为ICp原子荧光光谱法激发光源的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Copper, nickel and lead boosted-discharge hollow cathode lamps, run at recommended currents, have been compared with a high-powered inductively coupled plasma (ICP) as excitation sources in atomic fluorescence spectrometry (AFS). A similar comparison was made with a copper lamp run at higher currents. It was found that for lead and nickel, the fluorescence spectra differed in the relative intensities of the transitions observed with the two sources. No evidence was found for a difference in radiances between the two sources when the lamp was overrun. Although the lamps gave rise to lower blank standard deviation values, detection limits were worse because of poorer sensitivity due to the inability of the circular source to illuminate the required atom cell volume in the atomiser. It was concluded that the ICP was the better source, when the criterion is detection limits, but the lamps may be more convenient in some circumstances.
机译:在原子荧光光谱法(AFS)中,已将以推荐电流运行的铜,镍和铅增强放电空心阴极灯与高功率电感耦合等离子体(ICP)进行了比较。对于在较高电流下运行的铜灯进行了类似的比较。已经发现,对于铅和镍,在两种光源下观察到的跃迁的相对强度的荧光光谱不同。没有证据表明灯泡超限时两个光源之间的辐射差异。尽管这些灯产生的空白标准偏差值较低,但由于圆形光源无法照亮雾化器中所需的原子池体积,因此灵敏度较差,因此检测极限更差。结论是,当标准是检测极限时,ICP是更好的光源,但是在某些情况下,灯可能更方便。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号